THE latest US declaration that it will engage in a diplomatic boycott of the Winter Olympics due to be held in China is no surprise either to China or the rest of the world. But what can we make of this decision, which is contrary to the spirit of the games and the Olympic charter.
It is significant that the US press statement makes no mention of
the principle of Olympism, which
all member countries of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) are to abide by, but which the United States violated once before during the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics.
As stated in the IOC’s web front page: “The goal of the Olympic Movement is to contribute to building a peaceful and better world by educating youth through sport practised without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic
spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play.”
The same IOC front page also notes that: “The resolution entitled ‘Building a peaceful and better world through sport and the Olympic ideal’ was adopted today by consensus and co-sponsored by 173 member states at the 76th session of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly (GA) in
New York.”
Noteworthy is the fact that the US was not a co-sponsor of the resolution initiated by China, although it did not oppose it.
“So proud to introduce the Olympic Truce resolution for Beijing 2022. Thanks all for the consensual adoption by the UNGA, with the overwhelming co-sponsorship of 173 members. China attaches great importance to the Winter Olympics and Paralympics. Beijing is ready to welcome all from the world,” Chinese permanent representative to the UN Zhang Jun twittered.
The IOC’s position on politicising sports
In a speech introducing the resolution, which was principally aimed at discouraging the United States or any other country from politicising the games and sports around the world, IOC President Thomas Bach stressed the importance of peace and solidarity in our divided world: “By adopting this resolution, you are supporting the mission of the Olympic Games to unite the best winter sport athletes of the entire world, without any discrimination whatsoever, in
a peaceful and respectful competition. This bond of our shared humanity is even more relevant in our polarised
world today.
“We can only accomplish this mission if the Olympic Games stand above and beyond all political, cultural and other differences. This is only possible if the Olympic Games are politically neutral and do not become a tool to achieve political goals.”
The IOC president is not the only one who anticipated that the United States would use any excuse or pretext to discredit China in the international arena.
Speaking out too, the representative of the Russian Federation warned that sport should not become a political tool or an instrument of intrigue, such as blackmail, and it must never be used as an instrument of power involving sanctions.
In a similar vein, the representative of Belarus described some individual politicians’ attempts to “put on a show” and demagogue against the backdrop of the forthcoming Olympic Games as equally unacceptable.
He also noted dangerous precedents of how easily sporting events – designed to unite countries and peoples – can become an instrument of discord, pressure and political intrigue in the hands of dishonest politicians.
Justifying the Beijing boycott
When justifying the diplomatic boycott, US President Joe Biden’s administration has revived former US president Donald Trump’s charge of China’s alleged record of crimes against humanity and genocidal action in Xinjiang.
In fact, the US media has conveniently omitted to mention that until 2018, when Trump was looking for issues to win the presidential elections, the US State Department in charge of US foreign policy and the US media generally, were supportive of China’s
socio-economic policies aimed at assimilating and integrating the Uyghur Muslim community in a region with a legacy of ethnic conflict and terrorism.
This support can be seen in the US favourable views of Chinese efforts aimed at securing the peaceful development of the troubled province and even approval of the re-education camps currently hyped as the centre of China’s human rights abuses.
Many countries are fully aware of what is happening in Xinjiang. Responding to the recent US and Western media orchestrated
anti-China propaganda, countries including from the Muslim world, have defended China, notably in
the UN.
Today Biden, looking to prop up his popularity with the American public, which has plummeted to record low levels, is resorting to the same megaphone tarring of China’s internal policies used by Trump.
Denigrated by his Republican opponents for his domestic and foreign policy failures and his anaemic leadership, “Sleepy Joe” aka “Xiden” – the latter name a derogatory reference to his alleged pro-China stance in his earlier political career, the US president’s advisers and Democratic Party leaders are desperate for issues to counter the anti-Biden and
anti-Democrat Party political upsurge. But in manipulating human rights to win votes, they would do well need to look into their own mirror of US and Western human rights transgressions before denouncing China and other nations determined to walk a path of development that is independent, free and different from that of the West, and yet conforms to the principles of human rights and fundamental freedoms as enshrined in the UN Charter.
The US and its Western allies are pioneers and masters in racist and anti-Muslim propaganda and
the manufacturing of fabricated enemies, such as Saddam Hussein, who could be easily taken down.
Biden may yet win some support from American voters through the weaponising of the Winter Olympics against China. But it will be a short run and meaningless victory if the objective is to further vilify and take down the Chinese government.
Edelman Global Trust Barometer of 2020: Share of the public who trusted the government – Select countries: “80% of China’s citizens trust their government – the highest level in the world. In contrast, the governments of the US, the UK, Australia and Canada received 42%, 45%, 61% and 59% of public trust, respectively.
The reality is that over one billion Chinese stand in the way of the US and Western efforts to maintain their dominance of the world and deny China its place in the world.
The hypocritical efforts to capitalise on the now largely abandoned Peng Shuai story and Beijing’s Winter Olympics event to further isolate China has made good press in Washington, London, Canberra and Ottawa for a few days. But in China and among more critical audiences around the world, it will further swing the barometer of political legitimacy and trust in support of the Communist Party of China’s leadership of the country, which is already the highest in the world according to current available independent surveys.
Lim Teck Ghee’s Another Take is aimed at demystifying
social orthodoxy. Comments: letters@thesundaily.com
