We need to reduce roadkill

13 Oct 2020 / 10:43 H.

    THE increasing number of wildlife killed on our roads is an issue that Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) finds it increasingly difficult to ignore. The latest incidents involved two tapirs.

    The first case happened in Terengganu where the tapir, after being hit by a car, stumbled into the nearby forest. Injured wildlife often suffers long painful deaths. In the second accident, a tapir died from head injuries, possibly from being hit by a vehicle, in Johor.

    This alarming rise in the number of roadkills involves not only wildlife but domestic animals as well. In road accidents involving human deaths, these cases are noted, investigated with follow-up action taken. But with wildlife deaths, there are no investigation or preventive safety measures taken. Drivers of vehicles go off scot-free as there is no compensation to be paid regardless of whether the animal is an endangered or rare species. Worse, some dead animals are mutilated by people for their body parts because of a belief in its aphrodisiac value.

    Who is at fault for roadkills? When driving, most drivers do not watch out for slow scurrying mammals, amphibians and reptiles. Most commonly killed are monitor lizards, snakes, pangolins, frogs and monkeys. There are also those who pay no heed to the signboards warning about animal crossing.

    The expanding network of roads through wildlife habitats and increasing traffic volume are accelerating the extinction of many species . This is one of the major causes of wildlife decimation along with forest clearance, habitat destruction, clearance of wetlands, over exploitation and poaching and trade in wildlife.

    Construction of roads through wildlife habitats resulting in fragmented forests is a serious concern as it dissects age-old wildlife travel routes. The authorities have come up with eco-bridges or viaducts, underpasses and overpasses to enable wildlife to move from one fragmented forest to another. But the question remains as to how effective are these facilities for the purpose of safe wildlife crossings.

    Wildlife crossings may help to lessen the impact of roadkills, but it is not the panacea to foil the ill-effects of roads on wildlife and should not justify the building of roads into wildlife habitats. The first option is to avoid road slicing through wildlife habitats.

    Nothing will completely prevent animal deaths. But awareness of the enormity of roadkill tragedies should be incorporated into driver education courses. Drivers must be encouraged to watch for animals in or near roads.

    If any road development is likely to cause an impact on the native fauna, an Environmental Impact Assessment must be carried out and advice sought from the wildlife authorities.

    The best strategy of course is to reduce the need for roads along wildlife habitats.

    Meenakshi Raman


    Sahabat Alam Malaysia


    email blast